TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Direct Observation of a Transiently Formed Isomer during Iodoform Photolysis in Solution by Time-Resolved X-ray Liquidography (The Journal of Physics Chemistry Letters (2018) 9:3 (647-653) DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03125)
AU - Ahn, Chi Woo
AU - Ki, Hosung
AU - Kim, Joonghan
AU - Kim, Jeongho
AU - Park, Sungjun
AU - Lee, Yunbeom
AU - Kim, Kyung Hwan
AU - Kong, Qingyu
AU - Moon, Jiwon
AU - Pedersen, Martin Nors
AU - Wulff, Michael
AU - Ihee, Hyotcherl
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2019/2/7
Y1 - 2019/2/7
N2 - In the published Letter, the quantum yield of excited iodoform was underestimated, which was caused by a simple mistake in the scaling of the experimental scattering curves to the theoretical ones. To resolve this issue, we reanalyzed the data using the new scale factor. Accordingly, the time-dependent concentrations in Figure 4c and the related bimolecular rate constants in Figure 4a have to be modified. The corrected bimolecular rate constants are 6.46 ?0.02 ?109 M-1 s-1 for I + I ? I2 and 2.71 ?0.01 ?109 M-1 s-1 for CHI2 + I ? CHI3. The corrected Figure 4 is presented here. The quantum yield for excitation and the fraction of the excited state that relaxes back to the ground state without undergoing isomerization or fragmentation reaction are 11.3 ?0.1% and 18.5 ?2.9%, respectively, although these were not reported in the published Letter. This erratum does not affect conclusions reported in the Letter.
AB - In the published Letter, the quantum yield of excited iodoform was underestimated, which was caused by a simple mistake in the scaling of the experimental scattering curves to the theoretical ones. To resolve this issue, we reanalyzed the data using the new scale factor. Accordingly, the time-dependent concentrations in Figure 4c and the related bimolecular rate constants in Figure 4a have to be modified. The corrected bimolecular rate constants are 6.46 ?0.02 ?109 M-1 s-1 for I + I ? I2 and 2.71 ?0.01 ?109 M-1 s-1 for CHI2 + I ? CHI3. The corrected Figure 4 is presented here. The quantum yield for excitation and the fraction of the excited state that relaxes back to the ground state without undergoing isomerization or fragmentation reaction are 11.3 ?0.1% and 18.5 ?2.9%, respectively, although these were not reported in the published Letter. This erratum does not affect conclusions reported in the Letter.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060299192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00105
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00105
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 30653326
AN - SCOPUS:85060299192
SN - 1948-7185
VL - 10
SP - 500
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
IS - 3
ER -